Re: Odd Due Dates

[Roger Dutcher <dutcher dot roger at als dot lib dot wi dot us>]

Is it possible the customer has an expiration date on their card.  It won't
allow a due date beyond the expiration date.

Roger Dutcher
Beloit (WI) Public Library

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Janet Fine" <janetrfine at hotmail dot com>
To: <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Odd Due Dates


> 1.5.04
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Good thought, but my days closed file is ok.  The really odd thing is that
> the due date was correct in the item record, but not in the patron record.
>
> Janet
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: Tom Baker <tbaker at law dot columbia dot edu>
> Reply-To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> To: IUG INNOPAC List <innopac at innopacusers dot org>
> Subject: Re: Odd Due Dates
> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:57:14 -0500
>
> Was the machine refusing to make a due date on a date mentioned in the
Days
> Closed table?  This happened here recently, so it comes to mind.
> Tom B.
>
>
>
>
>               "Janet Fine"
>               <janetrfine at hotma
>               il.com>
To
>               Sent by:                  innopac at innopacusers dot org
>               innopac-bounces at i
cc
>               nnopacusers.org
>
Subject
>                                         Odd Due Dates
>               01/05/2005 10:49
>               AM
>
>
>               Please respond to
>               IUG INNOPAC List
>               <innopac at innopacu
>                   sers.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 1.5.05
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> This morning we checked out 2 items that have 7 day loan periods.  The
> correct due date is 1.12.05.  However,upon checkout, the due date  in the
> patron's record appeared as 1.10.05--not even one of our loan periods (we
> have 28 day, 14 day, 7 day and 3 day loan periods). I quit out of the
> patron
> record and viewed the item record and the correct due date was in the item
> record (1.12.05). I then viewed the patron record again and the due dates
> were no longer 1.10.05, but 1.12.05--the correct due date.   Has anyone
> seen
> this before?  I opened a call with III, but stuff like this creeps me
> out--once I start questioning something as basic as due dates, I have to
> start questioning everything and my brain just can't handle it!  Happy New
> Year!
>
> Janet Fine
> Department Head, Circulation Services
> Great Neck Library
> 159 Bayview Avenue
> Great Neck, NY 11023
> (516) 466-8055 ext. 205
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
> list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
> http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>
>
> Janet Fine
> Department Head, Circulation Services
> Great Neck Library
> 159 Bayview Avenue
> Great Neck, NY 11023
> (516) 466-8055 ext. 205
>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
> Public replies:  INNOPAC at innopacusers dot org
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/mailman/listinfo/innopac
>