[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ]
[ Date index for 2008 ]
[ Author index for 2008 ]
[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 10:22:39 +0800
- From: Yow Wei Chui <cceyowwc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Location of Hardware
Hi Byron,
I'm interested to know more about the systems librarian list too. Thank you.
Regards
Wei Chui
-----Original Message-----
From: Janet Fine [mailto:greatpl@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:39 AM
To: innopac@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Location of Hardware
4.8.02
Hi Byron,
I saw your response on he Innovative Listserve and was curious about the
Systems Librarian Listserve you mentioned. Could you forward to me
registration information? The discussions sound interesting and quite
relevant to my day to day activities. Thanks for your help.
Janet
Janet Fine
System Coordinator
Great Neck Library
159 Bayview Avenue
Great Neck, NY 11023
----- Original Message -----
From: "Byron C. Mayes" <bcmayes@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Innovative Users Group List" <INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Location of Hardware
> Patricia, et al.,
>
> A similar discussion occurred recently on the Systems Librarian list.
> Several persons replied, basically saying the same thing: You need to keep
> a critical server in an air-conditioned, humidity-controlled room. The
> humidity part is equally important I won't repost others' words, but what
> follows are my own comments from the same list (just in case someone here
> is reading this and thinks they've seen it before).
>
> In "Server farms take heat during crisis," (on ZDNet at
> <http://zdnet.com.com/2100-11-257567.html>) Rachel Konrad says, "Server
> farms, unlike auto and chip plants, must operate 24 hours a day,
regardless
> of the weather or power supply. They must maintain a constant temperature
> of about 68 degrees."
>
> The IT Baseline Protection Manual from Bundesamt für Sicherheit in der
> Informationstechnik does not give a specific number in its guidelines, but
> in it's example for overheating
> <http://www.bsi.bund.de/gshb/english/menue.htm> sites an incident in which
> "an overheating of the facilities with outside temperatures of more than
> 30° C [86 degrees F], was finally found, and was remedied with the
> installation of an air conditioning system."
>
> A discussion on TechRepublic, <http://www.techrepublic.com/>, quotes an
> article from a June 1996 PC Magazine: "Computer equipment works best when
> it is kept cool and does not experience extreme temperature fluctuations.
> The normal sine curve of heating and cooling is plus or minus 2 degrees,
> and 68 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit is a comfortable temperature. The more
> important setting on your A/C unit is the humidity. We suggest you set it
> at 35 to 45 percent."
>
> I had these items (above) bookmarked for a previous study, but you can
most
> likely find many more articles and discussions advising a constant
> temperature between 65 and 70 Fahrenheit and a humidity in the 35-50
range.
> Note that the temperature and humidity should be *constant* without wild
> fluctuations on a regular basis. The room as a work environment is not
> really that important, as ideally your work directly on the servers should
> be infrequent and targeted. I and my staff keep fleece sweaters/jackets
for
> those times when we might be in for prolonged periods. Those of us less
> tolerant of cooler temperatures also keep caps and light gloves. We keep
> our room at 67F and an alarm goes off when it breaks 70.
>
> I couldn't find much on room size. Obviously need enough room for the
> server and external peripherals, A/C and humidity-control equipment, any
> non-tech items that you want to have close at hand (books, tapes, etc.),
> and furniture for all of this hardware (and your server administrator) to
> sit on. A smaller room costs less to chill, but would be more likely to
> suffer in the event of an emergency. A pipe bursting over a 50-square-foot
> closet would (theoretically) leave a deeper puddle than the same pipe
> bursting over a 250-square-foot room. BTW, if your server is a
> floor/pedestal model, a raised floor with water sensors is a must.
>
> Byron
>
> At 04:11 PM 4/2/2002, Patricia Callahan wrote:
> >Hi, All,
> >
> >At present, our Innopac hardware, consisting mainly of a Digital 433au
> >personal workstation, Smart UPA, RAID cabinet, LAN box, Okidata 320
> >printer and a Wyse terminal (soon to be swapped for a computer) is
> >located in a locked air conditioned room that we share with some of our
> >law school's servers.
> >
> >We might be asked to give up that space, and although I hope that
> >doesn't happen, I would like to be prepared with the answers to some
> >questions. I know there are folks who monitor this list who know far
> >more than I do about the best conditions for computer hardware.
> >
> >Here are some of my questions:
> >1. I don't know if very many other Innopac libraries have their hardware
> >in an air conditioned room. It does sometimes get warm in our library,
> >close to 80 on occasion. How important is the air conditioning?
> >2. If we have to move our equipment to a smaller room that is not air
> >conditioned, given the equipment described above, what would be the
> >smallest room size advisable?
> >
> >Any other information, both to make an argument to keep the equipment
> >where it is or things we would need to know if it is going to be moved,
> >would be appreciated.
> >
> >Thank you!
> >
> >Pat Callahan
>
>
> --
> Byron C. Mayes, MLS
> Head, Library Systems and Technology Department * Temple University
Libraries
> 1210 W Berks Street * Philadelphia, PA 19122-6088
> bcmayes@xxxxxxxxxx * 215-204-5797 * Fax: 215-204-5201
> Listowner, BLACK-IP: The Black Information Professionals' Network
> Join at <http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/black-ip.html>
>
> --
> This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC
list
> Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
> Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac
>
>
--
This message was distributed through the Innovative Users Group INNOPAC list
Public replies: INNOPAC@xxxxxxxxxx
Update your subscription options:
http://innopacusers.org/list/listinfo/innopac