[ List Archives Home ] [ Thread index for 2008 ] [ Date index for 2008 ] [ Author index for 2008 ]


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
I'm not sure if this is the problem, but if you have serials charged to
these funds, and you have encumbered them with Status "c", these would not
have been caught in your list.
Cathy

At 09:09 AM 01/06/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I seem to have encumbrances in some fund displays that don't match the
>actual on-order records.  For example, I have an encumbrance of $1100 on
>one fund, but if I create a list using records with the same fund and
>status "o" and total the amount, I get a much smaller amount actually on
>order.
>
>Can anyone shed light on why this might happen?  It makes me not trust
>the fund displays at all--kind of discouraging at the end of our first
>year.
>
>Louise Merriam
>
>
>Minneapolis Public Library			It's too cold to snow...
>300 Nicollet Mall
>Minneapolis, MN  55401
>612-630-6461-TEL
>612-630-6468-FAX
>lmerriam@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:lmerriam@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>
>
***********************************************************************
Catherine Foreman                  phone: (905)688-5550 ext.3265
Bibliographic Services		   fax: (905)988-5490
Acquisitions Supervisor            email: cforeman@xxxxxxxxxx     		
James A. Gibson Library             
Brock University                     
St. Catharines, ON, Canada  L2S 3A1 
***********************************************************************